Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8

[Dan Honemann]

> The 75-300 IS was just awful, not as
> sharp as the 100-300, nor as good saturation.  But for me, 
> saturation is not as important as contrast, since I primarily
> shoot B&W (and mostly nudes, at that!.) 

Just how far away are those nudes you're shooting?!  For the price of 
the 100-400 IS, you could get the 85/1.2L or 135/2L and have change 
leftover--plus a much better lens for portraiture (IMO).

Dan

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************