From: Patrice Chiniara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Well, the problem with the 1200mm would probably be the weight. [snip]
>Too big, and you have to cut through way to much air to get to you
>subject, which ruins the image quality.
This is not so at all. I use 1120mm on birds all the time at distances of 20 feet and
less!
I'd often be using a couple of 25mm tubes on the 1200/5.6 . . . I'd love to have it.
Small birds at 15-20 feet, waterfowl at about 70 feet and large birds like eagles and
herons out to
120 feet. It would be very useful.
--
Terence A. Danks
Nova Scotia, Canada
Wildlife and Nature Photography
http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/danksta/home.htm
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
