Ken Durling wrote:
> Ah, I'm sure you're right. I was referring to a "bird lens" as longer
> than 400mm, though. Probably for my purposes the 100-400 plus 1.4x
> will serve.
Of course, for some folks, the only real bird lens is a 600mm. But, I have gotten
very respectable results with the 300/2.8L and Canon's 2x extender (which I only use
out of necessity), when used on a tripod and with a sharp, fine-grain film. I can
send you an example if you'd like.
> >> but my traditional side
> >
> >Would that be the side that wants to fill up your bag with zoom lenses? ;-)
>
> That'd be the one! 8-]
lol!
fcc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
