On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 20:44:33 +0100, you wrote: >Look for yourself at: >http://cybaea.com/photo/lens-quality-50.html >to see differences in optical quality, althought not scientific, it >confinced me. Very interesting little study. You're right, not scientific, and subject to a ton of variables like monitor, scan and storage quality, but the differences are there. I'm sure there are more differences not visible here. Ken * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS Lens kit plans Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Gary Russell
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans helen doane
- Re[2]: EOS Lens kit plans Dieter Henkel
- Re[2]: EOS Lens kit plans Karen Nakamura
- Re: Re[2]: EOS Lens kit plans Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans helen doane
- Re[2]: EOS Lens kit plans Dieter Henkel
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Drikus van der Veen
- Re[2]: EOS Lens kit plans Ken Durling
- Re[2]: EOS Lens kit plans Dieter Henkel
- RE: EOS Lens kit plans Paul Wasserman
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Pierre Bellavance
- SV: EOS Lens kit plans Christian Laurila
- Re: SV: EOS Lens kit plans Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS Lens kit plans Julian Loke
