Gerard Maas wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
>     In a few months (in the summer)  I'll be shooting a friend's
> wedding. (Yeap, I've read de "amateur wedding photographer FAQ", and I
> still said yes, I actually enjoy it  ;-)
> 
>     I did the same last year for some family (2x) and then, the deal was
> "just cover the costs". As I'm not getting paid (good insurance in case
> of something going wrong)  I  use to try thing on the 'victim's'
> expenses.

Have you ever tested this insurance? It might fail miserably 
sometimes ;-) Do they *really* realize what could happen? Or
are they just saying "Ok, we know that something could go wrong"
and think "Hey, he's a good photographer, everything will come
out ok?"

> Just few rolls of some exotic film, lithium batteries...
> Things that I use *anyway*  for their own good (and I gain the
> experience  :-) ;-)
> 
>     For this upcoming event I was thinking of renting a 'white' lens
> (70-200f2.8 L). Not having/used one before I thought it could be nice to
> play with it while they will get (!?) better shots.
> 
> REAAALLY!?

What lenses did you use before? A 70-200 zoom would be too long 
as the one and only lens for a wedding IMHO. 

> 
> Here is where my question comes up... Without *no* experience with a
> certain equipment I'm sure I won't be able to take the best of it. Quick
> handling only comes with experience, specially true with these heavy
> lenses.  On the other hand I've: better faster glas, sharper pictures
> (not without good handling!), blurry backgrounds and me falling in love
> with the whity thing (:-)

I don't think there's much of a learning curve with EF lenses. It 
is not *that* big a lens to make it hard to handle, you might feel 
your muscles the day after, though. :-) For outdoor portraits f/4 
or even f/2.8 (might give *too* shallow a DOF, so be careful) is 
great to have available.

> 
> The 3rd axis is that THIS is a good chance to try it. Specially since
> the rent price here (in Belgium) is quite high and I'm normally not able
> to pay it. This said, the option "rent it before to have some
> experience" is banned.  (unless some other victim appears before that,
> of course ;-) ;-)
> 
> I'd like to hear your thoughts about this subject.

You have done the job before and you are still alive, so your results
were likely not too bad ;-) So I'd say: rent it! But bring the lenses
you are used to as a backup. Just in case you feel too uncomfortable
with the heavey, whity thing ;-) But I think this is unlikely to happen.

Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to