>Forgive me for asking but is there anything wrong with your >70-200? I'd have thought it to be a very suitable portrait lens. the 70-200 is a very good lense, particularly at 200, but I use it primarily outside - inside the f4 can pretty quickly become a bit too slow using existing light, nonetheless it will make a nice portrait lense.. But I'd like a lense that will open up a little wider and reduce background clutter... and hey it seem like a good excuse to think about buying a new lense... Also I do think the 70-200 can be a bit intimidating for the subject.. there's something about the white lense that really flips people's switch.. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? John Pattenden
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? Kim
- EOS 100-400 L IS USM jul . loke
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? Gerard Maas
- EOS 100 2.8 Are there 2 models... John Pattenden
- Re: EOS 100 2.8 Are there 2 model... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 100 2.8 Are there 2 model... Kim
- Re: EOS 100 2.8 Are there 2 model... Gerard Maas
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? J.M. Vitoux
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommendation... John Pattenden
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommenda... J.M. Vitoux
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommenda... Jim Davis
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recomm... John Pattenden
- RE: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? Richard
- Re: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? Andy Heffernan
- RE: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? Chris J.T. Houston
- RE: EOS Portrait lense Recommendation... John Pattenden
- RE: EOS Portrait lense Recommendations?? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
