>What i saw was that only ONE french used a hood, on a SIGMA lens,
>then there ware MANY with big white L:s, couple of 20mm 2.8,
>20-35 2.8L, 20-35 3.5-4.5, 28-70 2.8L linses with no
>hood, no UV (for protection) filters or polararazer filters... i was
>the only one.. so i started to think i was doing something wrong ;)
>Just courious, do they have ANY reason for that???
Maybe because Sigma include the hood with their lens and that Canon
does not. Some of them photographers may not realize how useful a lens
hood is and did not purchase a hood for their Canon lenses.
Personally, I do not use a UV filter. After comparing images with and
without the filter, I find that images without the filter are sharper.
The UV filter degrade image slightly. I can't see any UV reduction in
my pictures. I'll have to try it again on a bright sunny day.
CC
--
Chieh's Web - http://Chieh.CameraHacker.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
