----- Original Message ----- >From: "Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 3:55 PM >Subject: Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 > >Are there any advantages left for the 20/2.8? > >Pierre > At 15:40 3/4/2001 -0500, tompc wrote: Well, it's half a stop faster! And it will make your wallet $30-60 lighter to carry around, although probably not enough to make up for the 2.3 ounces it will add to your bag.... ;^) tomp * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jansen
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Russell
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re[3]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS Kim
