Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5

[Thomas Bantel]

Pierre Bellavance schrieb:
> 
> Here are the results of my tests, which consisted of having 12 8x12 prints
> made from my negatives.
> 
> I took three different pictures with each lens, wide open and at f/8, with
> a tripod, as follows:
> 
> 20/2.8 at f/2.8 and f/8.
> 20-35/3.5-4.5 (at the 20mm setting) at f/3.5 and f/8.
> 
> Wide open, the 20-35 beats the 20mm, but at f/8 the 20mm beats the 20-35,
> in contrast and sharpness.

Well, did you also do a shot with the 20/2.8 at f/3.5? This would be a
direct comparison, f/2.8 vs f/3.5 is "a little" unfair. It's a 2/3 stop
difference.

Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************