Julian, Your message was convincing... ;-)) so much that I'm starting to think about buying the 20-35 even though I only need 20-24 (because of my 28-135). Pierre At 20:29 3/4/2001 -0500, you wrote: > > "Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You two guys are making life impossible for me!!! > > I had decided to go for the 20/2.8 and there you are convincing me > > that I should get the 20-35/3.5-4.5. > >Hello Pierre, > >I am doing no such convincing :-) > >Buy the EF 20 f/2.8 if you want. Or the Canon 20-35 f/3.5-4.5. Or the >Tamron 20-40 Or the Sigma 17-35 Or the Tokina 17/3.5 Or the Sigma 20/1.8 >or the ... > >Cheers :-) >Julian Loke * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re[3]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS Kim
- Re: EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jim Davis
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
