> "Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You two guys are making life impossible for me!!! > I had decided to go for the 20/2.8 and there you are convincing me > that I should get the 20-35/3.5-4.5. Hello Pierre, I am doing no such convincing :-) Buy the EF 20 f/2.8 if you want. Or the Canon 20-35 f/3.5-4.5. Or the Tamron 20-40 Or the Sigma 17-35 Or the Tokina 17/3.5 Or the Sigma 20/1.8 or the ... or the ... Cheers :-) Julian Loke * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re[3]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS Kim
- Re: EOS 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Jim Davis
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Ken Lin
