Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5

[Pierre Bellavance]

When I saw the price of the 17-35/2.8L, I immediately stopped considering it.

Pierre

At 03:44 3/5/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>: Short of buying both the 20/2.8 and the 20-35/3.5-4.5, which would be too
>: expensive and probably useless, I will have to decide someday soon...
>: I've changed my mind half a dozen times...
>: Pierre
>
>Pierre,
>Have you considered the 17-35/2.8L? Also, I didn't see anyone suggesting
>this lens. Is it too wide for you or the benefits does not justify the
>price? I understand that Photodo rates this lens lower than the
>20-35/3.5-4.5. Does this particular L lens is inferior than the consumer
>grade lens?
>
>Jansen.

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************