Tapani,
Are you sure that the camera and 100-400 lens (10 3/8 inches long total)
fit vertically in the Pro Mag 2 AW Bag?
This bag seems to look a lot like the S&F Specialist 85AW.
Thanks
Pierre
At 16:37 3/16/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Pro Mag II AW: big enough as long as you reverse the hood of the 100-400,
>with room to spare for smaller extra lenses or even another big one:
>the 100-400 also fits on the side with body plus another lens attached
>on top. About as convenient as a shoulder bag can be, the belt helps
>to put part of the weight on my hips and keep the thing in place
>when I swing it behind myself and kneel to look something low.
>My short-walk bag.
>
>Off Trail II: main compartment just big enough to hold EOS 3 + 100-400
>with hood reversed, removable side compartments hold the 28-135 with
>hood removed and put in sideways, ditto with 20-35/3.5-4.5, the
>100/2.8 USM macro fits even with hood on right. The best thing I've found
>for keeping the 100-400 easily accessible in hard terrain, I've
>even used it on horseback (just tighten the belt real tight).
>The 100-400 doesn't really fit in the side tubes however
>(well it can be squeezed there if you remove the tripod collar,
>I've done that a lot too but it's not exactly convenient).
>I don't know if the 20/2.8 would fit, probably also only
>with hood detached.
>
>--
>Tapani Tarvainen
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
