--- Robert Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Daniel ROCHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - based on the 1V
> > - 1/8000s
> > - 16 M.Pixels (based on the 24x36 CMOS sensor from
> > IBM)
<snip>
> Wow, that sounds already great. Now if it has a fast
> fps over a long sequence,
Heehee. How long do you think it takes a resonably
fast microcontroller to take 16Mpxl of data from a
sensor and do any manipulation (compression,
sharpening) and THEN fling it onto mass storage? This
is clearly going to take a pretty powerful processor
with some high energy requirements. :-)
The battery pack would be huge. Start working out now!
MadMat
PS This is the main reason I think the "digital film"
concepts we've been taunted with the past couple years
can't possibly work... where they hell do you put the
batteries to make it work? ;-)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
