On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:04:06PM +0100, Bob Talbot wrote: > > > 22.63 (22) 25.40 (25) 26.91 (27) 28.51 (29) > What is the conspiracy against f23? > > > Even here, even when it is so flagrantly discriminated against ... it > is as if it is ignored. Right you are - I missed it. A full stop, too. It does need a different explanation from the rest. I can only observe that (some?) other camera brands seem to agree with Canon on that point, at least my Ricoh GR1s does., and I seem to recall I've seen f/22 in other brands as well. I suspect that's a historical mistake that's become so entrenched in photographers' collective memory that changing it now would be dangerous... -- Tapani Tarvainen * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Hugo Lopes
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Thomas Bantel
- RE: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Severi Salminen
- RE: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments } ponyboy {
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Tapani Tarvainen
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Severi Salminen
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Tapani Tarvainen
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Hugo Lopes
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Tapani Tarvainen
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Vicente
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Don Weiss
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 1/2 stop and 1/3 stop increments Ken Durling
