On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:04:06PM +0100, Bob Talbot wrote:
> 
> >      22.63 (22)     25.40 (25)     26.91 (27)     28.51 (29)

> What is the conspiracy against f23?
> 
> 
> Even here, even when it is so flagrantly discriminated against ... it
> is as if it is ignored.

Right you are - I missed it. A full stop, too.
It does need a different explanation from the rest.
I can only observe that (some?) other camera brands seem to
agree with Canon on that point, at least my Ricoh GR1s does.,
and I seem to recall I've seen f/22 in other brands as well.
I suspect that's a historical mistake that's become so
entrenched in photographers' collective memory that
changing it now would be dangerous...

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to