----- Original Message ----- > Optically it seems it didn't meet expectations.
Have you seen: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/400-do.htm ?? Michael Reichmann likens it to the 300/2.8IS. It's apparently VERY good optically. JCDoss * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
