I wrote yesterday: > > I have a chance of buying a 300mm f/2.8 L Mark I lens and will be viewing it > on Saturday afternoon. What I need to know is there a Mark II and, if so, > what are the differences between them. > > The seller is a sports photog and he assures that the lens is in great > condition, body and glass. He has owned it from new for about 4 years and > has never had any faults and has been serviced twice by Canon UK. >
OK, I've seen the lens and inspected it and it looks real good. Now this guy is also selling his EF 400 f/2.8 L for the same price. The glass is perfect on both lenses but the 400 is not so good on the body (Only a fair wear on the tripod mount ring). Which one would you favour? Bob Turner Dundee, Scotland, U.K. Website : www.bawbee.co.uk * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
