Bob Turner wrote > OK, I've seen the lens and inspected it and it looks real good. > Now this guy > is also selling his EF 400 f/2.8 L for the same price. The glass > is perfect > on both lenses but the 400 is not so good on the body (Only a fair wear on > the tripod mount ring). Which one would you favour?
I use the 400 for sports and wildlife and am glad I bought it (using film). I'll be making the switch to digital, where a 1.3-1.5 factor exists. Then, I may wish I had bought the 300 for sports. 520 to 600 will sometimes be too much. For wildlife, however, I'll still use the digital camera, the 400, and a 2x converter! Buy the 400 if they're the same price. Then later sell the 400, buy a used 300 and a 70-200L with the $$. Dave B. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
