On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 15:42:36 -0000, you wrote: >After taking all of your advice into consideration I have gone for the 300 >f/2.8 L. The main factors being weight, flexibility and resale (in case my >'cunning plan' doesn't work out). > >Special Thanks to Bob Talbot, for his encouragement; Mick McCarron, for his >checklist and to Rob Mellor, Sorry mate, the 100-400 isn't for me now. > >Wishing everyone on the EOS List a Very Merry Christmas and Best Wishes for >2002. To paraphrase Jim Snyder 'May all of your EOS dreams come true'.
Oooh, I'm jealous. Congrats Bob! That's exciting. All the best to you too. (Have to report that my long lens funds have just been waylaid by a gorgeous musical instrument that I've been looking for for years! Obviously have mixed feelings about that, but first things first, that being my profession.) Ken Durling Photo.net portfolio: http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251 * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
