----- Original Message ----- > OK, I've seen the lens and inspected it and it looks real good. Now this guy > is also selling his EF 400 f/2.8 L for the same price. The glass is perfect > on both lenses but the 400 is not so good on the body (Only a fair wear on > the tripod mount ring). Which one would you favour? >
After taking all of your advice into consideration I have gone for the 300 f/2.8 L. The main factors being weight, flexibility and resale (in case my 'cunning plan' doesn't work out). Special Thanks to Bob Talbot, for his encouragement; Mick McCarron, for his checklist and to Rob Mellor, Sorry mate, the 100-400 isn't for me now. Wishing everyone on the EOS List a Very Merry Christmas and Best Wishes for 2002. To paraphrase Jim Snyder 'May all of your EOS dreams come true'. Bob Turner * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
