Bob Sull wrote:
Markus Proske wrote: > > > Chip Louie wrote: > > > > > A fixed length, sealed lens barrel like my EF 70-200 2.8L. Built-in > > > protective UV filtered glass front element and armored outer filter > ring, > > > shock absorbing hood mount, o-ring sealed lens mount would be a good > start. > > > Then add about 35mm on the long end and keep the f/2.8 lens speed > and keep > > > the IS feature OUT of the lens to make it affordable. > I'd love Canon to produce an (24)28-105(135) with IS and L-lense quality > but constant aparture of 3.5 or 4 to reduce weight.. > > Still dreaming, Markus. I have to agree with Chip. Keep the f/2.8 and the IS out to help keep the price down. ----------------------------------------------------------- Guess you guys don't use IS. That is the #1 reason I switched to EOS. Otherwise I would be a Nikon or Minolta user. For me, I will give up the F2.8 for an F4 but would love the IS. Peter K An "IS" user * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
