> > I'd love Canon to produce an (24)28-105(135) with IS and L-lense quality > > but constant aparture of 3.5 or 4 to reduce weight.. > > > > Still dreaming, Markus. > > > I have to agree with Chip. Keep the f/2.8 and the IS out to help keep > the price down. > > Guess you guys don't use IS. That is the #1 reason I switched to EOS. > Otherwise I would be a Nikon or Minolta user. For me, I will give up the > F2.8 for an F4 but would love the IS. > > Peter K > An "IS" user
An aparture of 2.8 is great, good background blur, etc. But no help, if I have to stop down without having a tripod. An f4 wood be enough for most of my purposes. With IS, I could travel light with just one (excellent) all-purpose lens (maybe along with the 24 TS-E). Markus * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
