"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" wrote: > > Bob Sull wrote: > > I have to agree with Chip. Keep the f/2.8 and the IS out to help keep > the price down. > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Guess you guys don't use IS. That is the #1 reason I switched to EOS. > Otherwise I would be a Nikon or Minolta user. For me, I will give up the > F2.8 for an F4 but would love the IS. > > Peter K > An "IS" user
I agree with both sides ;-) Both would be useful lenses - for different purposes. And I don't think it is necessary to have both the f/2.8 and IS in one lens, although this one would also have some nice applications. But I very much prefer an affordable lens with some compromises ... The 28-70 f/2.8L is a wonderful lens, now if it would be a 28-105 ... Thomas Bantel * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
