Thomas Bantel wrote:
I agree with both sides ;-) Both would be useful lenses - for different
purposes. And I don't think it is necessary to have both the f/2.8 and IS
in one lens, although this one would also have some nice applications.
But I very much prefer an affordable lens with some compromises ...
The 28-70 f/2.8L is a wonderful lens, now if it would be a 28-105 ...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas,
Canon made a good thing better when they added IS to their 70-200mm F2.8L
lens.
It still has the fast F2.8 aperture (Chip are you listening?) and now IS.
Plus it is reportedly sharper optically.
Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
