>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > Guess what, you're incorrect.  Some of use DO use IS lenses and
> with that
> > experience and knowledge would rather have a 1-2 stop faster lens than a
> > slower IS lens.  IS technology is impressive on the new super teles (I
> > rented an EF300 2.8L IS), and 70-200 2.8L IS zoom when used within its'
> > limits.  But IS just can't give me back the two stops of shutter speed I
> > need to freeze subject motion that a faster lens can and IS
> seems to slow
> > down AF capture speed and tracking.  So for ME, more often than not IS
> stays
> > switched off.
>
> That's actually interesting, I thought it would be the other way
> around. In
> my case, I keep IS on 90% of the time, except when I'm using a flash or a
> tripod. Not having IS on the 28-70 f/2.8L is what is keeping me
> from getting
> one...
>
> --
> Patrice Chiniara
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Hi Patrice,

How would IS help me freeze my subjects in motion with a slower shutter
speed?

Why do you feel the need for IS on a short lens like the EF 28-70 2.8L?  Are
you trying to shoot stationary subjects handheld at f/22 in the dark?


Regards,

Chip Louie

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to