Hi again Since this subject seems to have brought up a new life to this list, here is another opinion (not mine) that I find interesting: According to Chasseur D'Images, the test results of the 70-200/2.8L IS + 1.4X "drop noticeably" compared to the results of the same lens without converter. They go on by stating that "the performance (of the lens + converter) is inferior to that of a good prime lens without, however, being mediocre" As for the 100-400 it is interesting to notice that test results with the 1.4X converter, at max aperture, are pretty much the same as the results of the lens without converter. One opinion that is often stated in CI tests is that prime lenses perform better with converters than zooms. Having never used a converter, I'd like to know other people's opinions.
Regards, Hugo * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
