> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kotsinadelis, > Peter (Peter) > If the eyes are in focus at F2.8 are the ears and nose? Who says that for a good portrait the whole head has to be in focus? If the nose is out of focus it usually looks a bit funny but having the ears, neck, etc out of focus can make a great portrait if done correctly. Robert * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Hugo Lopes
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Ken Durling
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Craig Zendel
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? S2944
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Icoz, Evrim
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? David Chan
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- In/Out of focus portrait work -- was ... David Primm
- RE:Portraits [was: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Don
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Jorrit de Jager
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Tim Munro
