Craig Zendel wrote: >From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >(edited) > ......Agreed on more light but never use F2.8 for portraits or the >ears and nose will never be in focus. People who tell you >otherwise are amateurs who have never taken good portraits. Beware of sweeping statements. ------------------------------------------------------ OK Craig, You're on. So you have done a studio portrait at F2.8 and the nose and ears are perfectly in focus? Was it within a 10 foot area as in most studios? Would love to see that, can you point me to a link? Thanks. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Gary Fisher
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Hugo Lopes
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Ken Durling
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Craig Zendel
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? S2944
- EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Icoz, Evrim
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? David Chan
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Robert Meier
- In/Out of focus portrait work -- was ... David Primm
- RE:Portraits [was: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Don
- RE: EOS 70-200L IS or 100-400L IS ? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
