> > "Daniel ROCHA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: ... > One wonders just how many saleable shots were actually taken at F2.8 > on these lenses. I always found this aperture give too shallow a DOF > for a face. You can get maybe the nose in focus... > Depends what you are shooting. But even if you don't shoot at f2.8, you get quicker AF, and also an f2.8 lens shot at e.g. f4.0, would usually be better than an f4.0 shot at f4.0. By the time you get to f16, there would probably not be any difference. Steve * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Re: My ... Daniel ROCHA
- RE: EOS Re: My ... Robert Meier
- RE: Re: EOS Re: My First L G... Chip Louie
- RE: Re: EOS Re: My First L G... Alex Zabrovsky
- Re: EOS Re: My First L Glass Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: My First L Glass Daniel ROCHA
- RE: EOS Re: My First L Glass Chip Louie
- Re: EOS Re: My First L G... Thomas Bantel
- EOS Re: My First L Glass Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- Re: EOS Re: My First L Glass S2944
- EOS Re: My First L Glass Steven Kefford
- EOS Re: My First L Glass Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- Re: EOS Re: My First L Glass Thomas Bantel
- RE: EOS Re: My First L Glass Chip Louie
- RE: EOS Re: My First L Glass Roger Wong
- Re: EOS Re: My First L G... Jaakko Pitkäjärvi
- RE: EOS Re: My Firs... Alex Zabrovsky
- Re: EOS Re: My ... Jaakko Pitkäjärvi
- Re: EOS Re: My ... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Re: My ... Malcolm Stewart
- Re: Re: EOS Re: My First L Glass Harrison Mcclary