From: "Thomas Bantel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If the f/4 L zoom had been out at the time I bought my 80-200 f/2.8L, > I would likely have chosen the f/4 lens. f/4 is enough most of the time. > And for most of the few exceptions, I prefer my primes anyway. As much as > I love my 80-200 f/2.8, I leave it at home much too often just for it's > bulk and weight.
The 70-200/4 L USM has been introduced to meet the needs of just the focal lenghts with high optical quality. The 2,8 version is really a plus for people who needs high shutter speeds for example. We have the choice :) <+> WEb ~ hTML ~ PhOTo <+> http://www.monochromatique.com Association de Photographes - http://ecpa.eu.org http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/canoneos_fr * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
