----- Original Message ----- From: "Logan Reinwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was reading this thread and was surpised since what I heard when the IS > version show up is that the performance are a bit lower than the perf of the > non IS version: the olfd version is better!....................
The other issue with the newer version was claimed faster AF performance, which was one of the features that attracted me. As for optical performance, the new lens is just fabulous at all apertures. I'm looking at an article right now which I shot for a motorcycle magazine and it features a full page colour reproduction of a bike coming at me on the back wheel that I shot at f2.8 which is as crisp and sharp as anything you are likely to see (any aussies out there can check it out in the December edition of Two Wheels - in the newsagents now). I think either lens will surpass the optical requirements of most of us. Regards, Tim www.timmunro.com.au * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
