Just read on certain website that the 70-200/2.8L USM IS is somewhat superior to it's predecessor (no IS) in terms of optical quality, even though having more internal elements. Can somebody confirm that ? Did they really further enhanced optical design producing the IS version so it is even better optically then the regular version ?
Regards, Alex Z * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
