What did you mean the 28-135 is limiting factor on D60 ? Is that about the relatively low-grade performance of this lens ? I'm wondering because Photodo has rating this lens quite high (3.5)
I'm considering one to complement my EOS-3 as the main glass (well the 70-200/2.8L USM is on its way to me) based of numerous online appraisal reviews and scores, shouldn't I listen them and strive to save for 28-70/2.8L USM instead ? (about 400-450 US$ price gap between new 28-135 and used good condition 28-70L) Regards, Alex Z -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Quack Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EOS Which lenses with a D60? > Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:55:49 -0600 > From: "Alex Barnes" > Subject: Re: EOS Which lenses with a D60? > LOL...the 28-135 is only good enough for web-sized images? It is easily outperformed by the D60. Clearly the 28-135 on the D60 is the limiting factor. > I have a couple of pretty nice 8x10s (printed on a Frontier) > from my lowly 24-85 USM+D60, which I'm sure isn't any better > than the 28-135. Can neither deny nor second that, I have never tried the 24-85 myself. > Not all of us can afford a stable of L glass, Then try the EF 1.8/50 mm in comparison. Or the Ef 2.5/50 mm compact macro. Or the EF 1.8/85 mm. All lenses of reasonable prices that show you the difference. -- Michael Quack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fast, reliable, cheap. Pick any two of the three. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
