> Hi Everyone > for awhile I've been noticing that when I set my AF > lenses to MF on any of my OESes there is a small range > in terms of barrel turning where the confirm light > stays on. Yet the split image can narrow it down far > more. It's only 2 degrees or so with MF confirm but > far less with the split image. The question is, is MF > more accurate than AF or MF confirm? > Has anyone else observed this? > See Ya Javier
It has been documented. MF can indeed be more accurate than AF. I've not tested this with D30 / D60 but on the 1n reproducibility of focus point (judged my distance marks) can be almost perfect by eye. AF, throws surprises. I have a link to some tests on this - I'll post them if I remeber where I filed them * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
