Digital still does not equal film when it comes to black and white.  It
comes close, with a great deal of manipulation, but is isn't there, at least
not yet.  I've tried a lot of different approaches, and to many, I've gotten
there, but to my own critical eye, it isn't there.  And it isn't a matter of
resolution, it's a matter of tonal quality.
And to the thought that any who argue in favor of film don't use EOS
digital, I use a D30 and a borrowed 10D.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Davis Nature Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 4:57 AM
Subject: Re: Re: EOS 70-200 IS effective range


> "Al Ruscelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>
.
>
> It's hard for me to imagine a circumstance where film is better.
> Especially if we're talking 35mm film. Sports, nature, concerts, all
> better with digital. And i believe portraits too. I'm sure there are
> some photogs out there that will argue this, but they likely don't
> have an EOS digital.
>
>
> Jim Davis
> - checkout the Motorcycle Headlight Relay Kit at:
> http://jimdavis.oberro.com/html/bike_acc_.html



*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to