Digital still does not equal film when it comes to black and white. It comes close, with a great deal of manipulation, but is isn't there, at least not yet. I've tried a lot of different approaches, and to many, I've gotten there, but to my own critical eye, it isn't there. And it isn't a matter of resolution, it's a matter of tonal quality. And to the thought that any who argue in favor of film don't use EOS digital, I use a D30 and a borrowed 10D. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Davis Nature Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 4:57 AM Subject: Re: Re: EOS 70-200 IS effective range
> "Al Ruscelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: > . > > It's hard for me to imagine a circumstance where film is better. > Especially if we're talking 35mm film. Sports, nature, concerts, all > better with digital. And i believe portraits too. I'm sure there are > some photogs out there that will argue this, but they likely don't > have an EOS digital. > > > Jim Davis > - checkout the Motorcycle Headlight Relay Kit at: > http://jimdavis.oberro.com/html/bike_acc_.html * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
