I have a Kiron 105/2.8 macro for Nikon, and the 100/2.8 USM Canon lens, and I really can't tell the results apart. The Kiron is almost as good as the old 105/4 Nikkor, and better than the 2.8.
Hi Henning,
The 105/2.8 macro is the Kiron that I was referring to. It's good to know that I won't be giving up anything to the Kiron when I finally get around to purchasing the Canon macro. Right now I'm getting by using a 500D close-up lens (filter) on my 70-200mm EF zoom.
Later, Johnny __________________________
Johnny Johnson
Lilburn, GA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
