Peter Kwrote: >W S wrote: > >I thought one of the claims was the difference in the amount of light >required to do the same exposure. That is the Lumisphere was suppose to >be more light efficient. I would be curious to know if that will be in >the results? >------------------------------------------ >Wayne, > >So far we see no difference. A larger diffuser should provide a larger >light source but at a reduced output comparativley speaking. We are >shootin a subject at about 7 feet in a studio with white background to >see shadows and exactly what the results will yield in terms of shadows >and light. Again, no difference thus far visually and the histogram of >the Spehere and omnibounce are identical.
Thanks, I know that walls and ceiling can make a big difference with effective light output. So I would expect that probably makes more of a difference than anything else. WayneS * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
