Hi Hi Bob
> > > Uhhhhh, what more do you want from a lens? The 28-135 I use on my > EOS-3 works on my 20D just as well. The image makes its way through the > glass and unto the image sensor just fine. > > The size of the image sensor is resposible for the 1.6 "crop factor" . yes, and that's my issue ... this previously wasn't an issue with EOS cameras, and now there seems to be different capture area factors to include. > This may take a little getting used to but isn't there a difference > between the 5X7 and 4X5 when using, say a 75mm lens? yes ... my point exactly ... the 75mm is a wider field of view on the 5x7 camera, so my TS-E 24 is now a narrower field of view on the digital EOS ... nothing to do with the lens, everything to do with the different EOS body. Of course a 5D or a 1D would mean different results to the 20D, but then that's why I asked are all EOS's equal now? previously my 630, or a 1 or 55 or rebel or any other EOS camera gave me the same results in terms of what I expected to see in the view finder and in my image. > > From my point of view, any incompatibilty would be with the "S" lenses > which are designed for the digital bodies and can't be used on my -3. ah yes ... them too ... won't fit onto any of my EOS film bodies either. Now that I've got one (had to get something to be able to take wide shots again) I can't use it on anything else in the EOS range ... perhaps not even the 1D so, is it time to create a EOS D category? * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
