----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Gamba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 2:13 AM

Oggetto: Canon 75-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM vs Canon 70-200 f/4 L + Canon 1.4x extender

Good morning board!!!

I have a 75-300 IS (not the new 70-300 IS) and i think that at 300 is REALLY soft...

So I'm interested in changing it and buy a 70-200 f/4 that seems to be one of the sharpest tele zoom for the EOS...

Ok considerations..

- Lose 100m long end... I think I will also buy a 1.4x canon to reach 280 f/5.6 with good results (witch I do not have eith the 75-300) - At 5.6 I still have AF on... - Lose IS...... Ok can get faster speeds (f/4 against f/5.6) use a little higher ISO (not so mutch noise at 800 with my 350D).... Use tele mainly in bright light conditions, so I think thin will not be a "great" problem... And 70-200 f/2.8 IS will REALLY kill my budget...
- Gain  excellent quality build (L lens)
- Gain non rotating/extending lens
- Gain FASTER AF!! 75-300 hunst a lot especially at 300 and is really slow...
- Gain FTM...

I was thinking to use more tripod of course, wont buy the optional collar for the 70-200 f/4 (too expensive) do you think i can use it with no problem using tripod attacched to the battery grip?

Gonna changhe my "crap" tripod (50€) to something better:

manfrotto 055clb tripod triminor classic balck

manfrotto 484rc2 ball head mini rapid take off

What do you think?

Thanks for any advice

Marco

------------------------------------------------

Marco,

The new 70-300IS in another league, optically. However, there is a well documented problem in portrait orientation at the long end that Canon is aware of, though hasn't officially acknowledged. IF this is corrected I'll buy another straight away (I tried 3, they were all more or less identical).

Might just be worth waiting awhile?

CraigZ
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to