I had Monaco EZ Color but when they wanted full price for the next upgrade I decided to switch to ColorVision PhotoCal, plus I needed LCD calibration.
It seems the blue changes the fastest on LCD monitors. I had the Samsung SyncMaster 213T, but the light on those go out of calibration range with a dim light within a year. I cannot recommend that monitor. I now have a Dell 24" monitor with plenty of brightness and seems to hold calibration longer than the Samsung. I likewise use the Epson 2200 profiles and once I have Photoshop set up correctly, Ctrl-Y toggles between what the print will look like versus the monitor. That is pretty close although it is hard to tell whether the darks are really matching correctly. WayneS At 09:43 AM 5/22/2006, Lars wrote: >I use a Spyder & PhotoCal setup on my computer. The colors of the >calibrated monitor match the 2200 print output very nicely, especially >when the monitor just had been recalibrated again . (Yes, calibration >should be redone regularily.) > >I use the standard Epson "Semigloss" print profile. I am thinking >that the printed colors match the monitor colors so well because >the printer profile assumes a calibrated (or "standard") system? > >Lars * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
