On 25/8/06, Jane Waters, discombobulated, unleashed: >Back to the conversation of 4 vs. 2.8. My real plus for the 2.8 is that >it carries the same front >end size as the 24-70, 16-35 (77mm). The f/4 is 67mm, meaning yet >another set of filters... eek! >(more weight in that pesky backpack...) Closest focal distance is only a >difference of about 6 >inches, so despite the added weight I still think the 2.8 has more bang >for the buck.
Jane what filters do you use on a regular basis? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
