gave up using the UV... too much extra glass, and I don't like the non-L glass quality of it. But, I do use a B+W circular pol more than I would admit to. I live at the beach, so it stays on one of the lenses all the time (that way I won't forget to carry it). As for the others, B+W soft focus, Promaster diffuser. I've got a boatload of other filters, but I don't shoot much black and white anymore (I kept my EOS-1 just in case), and that list is: 80B, Y2 yellow, sepia, R2 red, PO1 green, and finally a cross-star (which is somewhere in a box, because it's a 58... and nothing I have now works with it.
and, I have a set of large Lee nd filters and the holder is 77mm. Jane --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25/8/06, Jane Waters, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Back to the conversation of 4 vs. 2.8. My real plus for the 2.8 is that > >it carries the same front > >end size as the 24-70, 16-35 (77mm). The f/4 is 67mm, meaning yet > >another set of filters... eek! > >(more weight in that pesky backpack...) Closest focal distance is only a > >difference of about 6 > >inches, so despite the added weight I still think the 2.8 has more bang > >for the buck. > > Jane what filters do you use on a regular basis? > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
