I've noticed how heavy those circular polarizers are, wish they were as light as the old linear ones......
;^) tomp > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jane Waters > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: EOS New F4 IS > > not a clue. Yet... > I've got a call into someone who might be able to answer it. > First I've seen of it. > > Back to the conversation of 4 vs. 2.8. My real plus for the > 2.8 is that it carries the same front end size as the 24-70, > 16-35 (77mm). The f/4 is 67mm, meaning yet another set of > filters... eek! > (more weight in that pesky backpack...) * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
