I can't afford whatever single digit D will replace the 5D at this time, but the sensor cleaning features are almost enough to make me consider a 40D as an upgrade to my 5D. Even the 400D is tempting.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:36:13AM -0700, Bob Meyer wrote: >The 5D is impressive, no doubt. Beyond my budget, >though. And for my needs (lots of sports), the faster >AF of the 20D/30D suits me better anyway. > >If the 40D simplly adds the 10 MP sensor and anti-dust >features to the existing 30D, I'll save my money and >keep using my 20D. 8MP is enough for 95% of what I do, >and I can clean my own sensor for a lot less than >$1500 USD. > >I'm looking for a 30D size body and sensor with the AF >and metering capabilities equal to the 1D MKII. > >Bob Meyer >I don't suffer from insanity... I enjoy every minute of it. -- void *(*(*schlake(void *))[])(void *); * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
