I don't know whether or not it is feasible (depends on how the spike is configured), but you could try testing the engine configuration without, then with, the spike and compare the thrust developed.



Tony Fredericks                 "Mind that bus!"
Amateur Rocket Scientist        "What Bus?"
E.R.P.S. Member                 SPLAT!! - Arnold Rimmer





From: Henry Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ERPS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ERPS] FYI - Aviation Week Aerospike article
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:28:49 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Pierce Nichols wrote:
> a) a significant amount of the total thrust should be produced by the
> expansion of the gasses against the spike. Other than direct measurement,
> this can be inferred from careful observation of the plume and/or
> demonstration of performance characteristics that indicate that this is the
> case. To my mind, this is the definition of an aerospike -- other
> properties and advantages flow from this.


Technically, for it to be an *aero*spike, the spike must be truncated, and
after the wake closes, there must be some thrust contribution from base
pressure (the exhaust gas expanding against the virtual spike formed by
the trapped gas).

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list


_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to