On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
Total nit, but ThrowingPut would be
better. Or FalliblePut, or to be long-winded, PutCapableOfThrowing
but not
ThrowablePut (the Put is not the object thrown, an exception is).
Any of these are better. ThrowingPut indicates what happens when
failure occurs and I think that is good if throwing is always what
happens when failure occurs. FailablePut doesn't make such indication.
Failure means an exception in ES3. I like FalliblePut better than
ThrowingPut; either is a fix to ThrowablePut.
/be
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
