Hi Martin, I see that you are doing some pretty cool stuff (for example, "Text Analysis in Information Streams: Status Quo and Future Perspectives (http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/wi2/wp/en/2009/08/10/text-analysis-in-information-streams-status-quo-and-future-perspectives/)". What about including a text analysis aspect to the collaboration?
D. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Like I said last week when we first found out about #ubimic, you seem > to think along the same lines as the ESME team. So I can't find a any > reason why we shouldn't cooperate. > > IMHO David has defined very well the differentiating characteristics > of ESME: real-time responsiveness and actions. Actions also have some > vague similarity to some Google Wave bots. More importantly, actions > are important in many integration scenarios, which is the goal of > ESME. > > What I'm eagerly awaiting is a description of some of the benefits of > the "aggregated data from people and things" in different scenarios, > but I guess that's one of the goals of the collaboration ideas, right? > > Best Regards, > Vassil >
