Just blogged about our cooperation with #ubimic http://blog.esme.us/collaborative-efforts-with-ubimic/
D. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I have been so quiet on this thread. > In between work and travels, and finishing the design of the new UI I simply > didn't find the time. > > I am happy to see the collaboration take place and once the UI is up and > running I should have more time to help you out here. > > /Anne > > On 13. nov. 2009, at 10.00, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> I'll work on some more details for the scenarios this weekend. >> >> D. >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Martin Böhringer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I pointed Marcelo from akibot to our conversation. He is very interested >>> and >>> will come back to us. >>> Martin >>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> Von: Richard Hirsch [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 08:30 >>>> An: [email protected] >>>> Betreff: Re: Collaboration with #ubimic >>>> >>>> I was looking at the akibot offering last night and it does look >>>> interesting. Depending on the current akibot architecture, it might be >>>> relatively easy to create an ESME bot based on their existing >>>> technology. They could market their engine as a standalone component >>>> and offer it to customers who want to track twitter or other >>>> microblogging systems such as ESME. The bot could analyze the >>>> messages and either create new messages or integrate with back-end >>>> applications. It would be a loosely-coupled integration. >>>> >>>> We talked about having tightly-integrated plugins a while back but >>>> never looked at it in more detail. >>>> >>>> We should keep akibot in mind and as things develop maybe you connect >>>> us up to see how we might collaborate. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Martin Böhringer >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Dick, >>>>> >>>>> the current status on our student research is as following: I have a >>>> >>>> student >>>>> >>>>> who works on the LEGO thing, the hardware is all built up and the >>>> >>>> software >>>>> >>>>> part of the project starts tomorrow with a kickoff. Another student >>>> >>>> is >>>>> >>>>> working in his bachelor thesis on the "text analysis in information >>>> >>>> streams" >>>>> >>>>> topic. A bachelor thesis is not that big but I hope at least that we >>>> >>>> get >>>>> >>>>> some insights in what is possible and what not. He also should look >>>> >>>> at >>>>> >>>>> public available APIs (like opencalais and similar) and test them >>>> >>>> with >>>>> >>>>> microblogging-like texts. >>>>> >>>>> I know from the akibot guys (akibot.com) that they want to go in a >>>> >>>> similar >>>>> >>>>> direction like us (supporting a ubiquitous microblogging scenario >>>> >>>> with their >>>>> >>>>> artificial intelligence microblogging bot). So this might be a good >>>> >>>> future >>>>> >>>>> collaboration opportunity, too. >>>>> >>>>> What I would do next is looking for a student who wants to work >>>> >>>> intensively >>>>> >>>>> on the SAP/ESME scenario. Give me a view weeks for that. >>>>> >>>>> Vassil has a good point here with the business value. We are all >>>> >>>> working in >>>>> >>>>> microblogging and therefore say "hey, tweeting SAP systems are really >>>> >>>> cool". >>>>> >>>>> However, "normal" people might not have this enthusiasm. Until we >>>> >>>> have real >>>>> >>>>> demo systems running little mockups (GUI prototypes) might do it. We >>>> >>>> have it >>>>> >>>>> on our agenda to create a #ubimic presentation where we state out the >>>>> motivation and the benefits. I hope to give some answers to the >>>> >>>> business >>>>> >>>>> value topic in this presentation. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>>> Von: Richard Hirsch [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 23:28 >>>>>> An: [email protected] >>>>>> Betreff: Re: Collaboration with #ubimic >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Martin, >>>>>> >>>>>> I see that you are doing some pretty cool stuff (for example, "Text >>>>>> Analysis in Information Streams: Status Quo and Future Perspectives >>>>>> (http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/wi2/wp/en/2009/08/10/text- >>>>>> analysis-in-information-streams-status-quo-and-future- >>>> >>>> perspectives/)". >>>>>> >>>>>> What about including a text analysis aspect to the collaboration? >>>>>> >>>>>> D. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Martin, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Like I said last week when we first found out about #ubimic, you >>>> >>>> seem >>>>>>> >>>>>>> to think along the same lines as the ESME team. So I can't find a >>>> >>>> any >>>>>>> >>>>>>> reason why we shouldn't cooperate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IMHO David has defined very well the differentiating >>>> >>>> characteristics >>>>>>> >>>>>>> of ESME: real-time responsiveness and actions. Actions also have >>>> >>>> some >>>>>>> >>>>>>> vague similarity to some Google Wave bots. More importantly, >>>> >>>> actions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> are important in many integration scenarios, which is the goal of >>>>>>> ESME. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What I'm eagerly awaiting is a description of some of the benefits >>>> >>>> of >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the "aggregated data from people and things" in different >>>> >>>> scenarios, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but I guess that's one of the goals of the collaboration ideas, >>>>>> >>>>>> right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>> Vassil >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > >
