Thanks. I'll work on some more details for the scenarios this weekend.
D. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Martin Böhringer <[email protected]> wrote: > I pointed Marcelo from akibot to our conversation. He is very interested and > will come back to us. > Martin > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Richard Hirsch [mailto:[email protected]] >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 08:30 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: Collaboration with #ubimic >> >> I was looking at the akibot offering last night and it does look >> interesting. Depending on the current akibot architecture, it might be >> relatively easy to create an ESME bot based on their existing >> technology. They could market their engine as a standalone component >> and offer it to customers who want to track twitter or other >> microblogging systems such as ESME. The bot could analyze the >> messages and either create new messages or integrate with back-end >> applications. It would be a loosely-coupled integration. >> >> We talked about having tightly-integrated plugins a while back but >> never looked at it in more detail. >> >> We should keep akibot in mind and as things develop maybe you connect >> us up to see how we might collaborate. >> >> D. >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Martin Böhringer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Dick, >> > >> > the current status on our student research is as following: I have a >> student >> > who works on the LEGO thing, the hardware is all built up and the >> software >> > part of the project starts tomorrow with a kickoff. Another student >> is >> > working in his bachelor thesis on the "text analysis in information >> streams" >> > topic. A bachelor thesis is not that big but I hope at least that we >> get >> > some insights in what is possible and what not. He also should look >> at >> > public available APIs (like opencalais and similar) and test them >> with >> > microblogging-like texts. >> > >> > I know from the akibot guys (akibot.com) that they want to go in a >> similar >> > direction like us (supporting a ubiquitous microblogging scenario >> with their >> > artificial intelligence microblogging bot). So this might be a good >> future >> > collaboration opportunity, too. >> > >> > What I would do next is looking for a student who wants to work >> intensively >> > on the SAP/ESME scenario. Give me a view weeks for that. >> > >> > Vassil has a good point here with the business value. We are all >> working in >> > microblogging and therefore say "hey, tweeting SAP systems are really >> cool". >> > However, "normal" people might not have this enthusiasm. Until we >> have real >> > demo systems running little mockups (GUI prototypes) might do it. We >> have it >> > on our agenda to create a #ubimic presentation where we state out the >> > motivation and the benefits. I hope to give some answers to the >> business >> > value topic in this presentation. >> > >> > Cheers >> > Martin >> > >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >> Von: Richard Hirsch [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 23:28 >> >> An: [email protected] >> >> Betreff: Re: Collaboration with #ubimic >> >> >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> >> >> I see that you are doing some pretty cool stuff (for example, "Text >> >> Analysis in Information Streams: Status Quo and Future Perspectives >> >> (http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/wi2/wp/en/2009/08/10/text- >> >> analysis-in-information-streams-status-quo-and-future- >> perspectives/)". >> >> What about including a text analysis aspect to the collaboration? >> >> >> >> D. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Vassil Dichev <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Martin, >> >> > >> >> > Like I said last week when we first found out about #ubimic, you >> seem >> >> > to think along the same lines as the ESME team. So I can't find a >> any >> >> > reason why we shouldn't cooperate. >> >> > >> >> > IMHO David has defined very well the differentiating >> characteristics >> >> > of ESME: real-time responsiveness and actions. Actions also have >> some >> >> > vague similarity to some Google Wave bots. More importantly, >> actions >> >> > are important in many integration scenarios, which is the goal of >> >> > ESME. >> >> > >> >> > What I'm eagerly awaiting is a description of some of the benefits >> of >> >> > the "aggregated data from people and things" in different >> scenarios, >> >> > but I guess that's one of the goals of the collaboration ideas, >> >> right? >> >> > >> >> > Best Regards, >> >> > Vassil >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >
