Jon wrote:
> I don't understand - a large pack wouldn't need to be as large as a > split pack, because the C/ rate would be lower, hence the peukert > effect wouldn't be as severe. I was (theoretically) assuming a smaller pack for the downhill leg. The net would be smaller. > Also, the batteries would be longer lived, since they'd live a less > stressful >existance. Well, now you're getting practical ! :] I still think it's a bridge too far without being able to recharge on the other end. > You might want to look into the following alternate battery > technologies (in no particular order) Seth estimated $15K-$20K plus the purchase of the base vehicle. That's getting pricey. Vince
